Memory forensics concepts involve capturing and analyzing volatile RAM contents to uncover runtime system states, processes, malware artifacts, and encryption keys that disappear upon shutdown, complementing disk-based investigations with live evidence.
This discipline reveals hidden threats like fileless malware, injected code, and network connections invisible on persistent storage, requiring specialized acquisition and parsing techniques for defensible results.
Memory Acquisition Fundamentals
Memory acquisition creates forensic copies of physical RAM using methods that minimize system impact.
Live acquisition occurs on running systems via software injectors or hardware readers, prioritizing speed to preserve volatiles. Tools generate raw dumps (.raw, .mem) verified by hashes; challenges include 64-bit address spaces and anti-debugging malware altering dumps.

Workflow: Inject → Dump → Hash → Offline storage.
Memory Structure and Parsing
RAM organizes into kernel/user space, process address spaces, and pools holding executables, heaps, stacks.
Profiles map OS-specific structures (e.g., Windows _EPROCESS, Linux task_struct); frameworks load dumps against profiles for parsing. Analysis scans pools for artifacts using signatures or offsets.
Core Analysis Objectives
Investigations target runtime evidence across categories.
Process enumeration identifies injected/hidden malware via anomaly detection (unlinked lists, DKOM). Network analysis extracts sockets, connections from tcpip.sys equivalents. Code recovery dumps process images for disassembly; credential dumping targets LSASS equivalents.

Common Artifacts and Detection
Runtime traces reveal compromise indicators.
1. Process hollowing: Legit parent with malicious child imagebase.
2. API hooks: Inline/patch modifications in ntdll.dll.
3. Rootkits: Hidden kernel modules via SSDT/IDT scans.
4. Fileless attacks: PowerShell/AMSIBuffer in memory streams.
Timelines merge from process creation times, socket states.
Frameworks and Tooling

Workflow: Acquire → Profile → Enumerate → Scan anomalies → Dump suspects → YARA scan.
Challenges and Anti-Forensics Countermeasures
Volatility, address space randomization, and evasion complicate analysis.
1. Large dumps (32-128GB): Use targeted scans.
2. Profile mismatches: Custom offsets or symbol tables.
3. Anti-forensics: Memory wiping detected via pattern anomalies.
Best practices: Multiple profiles, cross-validation with disk artifacts, live acquisition scripting.
Memory forensics bridges runtime/disk gaps, detecting advanced threats through structured RAM dissection essential for 2025 incident response.
We have a sales campaign on our promoted courses and products. You can purchase 1 products at a discounted price up to 15% discount.